Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT. Show all posts

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Posing for Charity

My fiancé and I are giant dorks who love to show each other stuff we've found on the internet. Occasionally these things are socially acceptable to share with the masses. The other day Don showed me a post he had found on Jim C. Hines' blog that I immediately knew I had to blog about.

Hines, a fantasy writer, is raising money for the Aicardi Syndrome Foundation in a rather unusual way: by taking photographs of himself posing in the ridiculous and hyper-sexualized manner of women on book covers. You can find some of these photos here, here, and here (with special guest poser, John Scalzi). You can also find a post about what we should be laughing about when we see these photos rather than what we might be laughing about here. As Hines himself says:
...if you’re laughing because you’re a straight guy and therefore must declare all male bodies brain-searingly ugly? If you’re laughing because you think a man in a dress is funny and should be mocked? In other words, if you’re laughing because of various aspects of ingrained sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and other discriminatory nonsense? Then you’ve missed the point so badly it’s not even funny.
The point Hines is trying to make is a good one. We as a society tend to laugh at that which we find absurd...and we find the wrong things absurd. The media has shown us images of men in dresses (think TootsieMrs. Doubtfire, Work It, etc.) and told us to laugh at them. In a world where sexuality and gender expression are a spectrum and in which rigid gender roles are forced on us from birth even if we don't want them to be, the message from the media is that men should wear pants and suits and that only women can wear dresses and skirts and that any man who doesn't fall into those strict guidelines should be laughed at. Our pink/blue dichotomy is impressed upon us even before we're out of the womb and the media does everything in its power to keep us thinking of ourselves in an either/or sense--mostly for the sake of advertising products and measuring demographics, I'm sure.

Hines is pointing out the absurdity of the aforementioned ridiculous and hyper-sexualized poses that women are portrayed in on book covers. Science fiction and fantasy are ripe with examples of this, but they can be found everywhere. How many times have you seen a man lying across a car in a skimpy bathing suit or lasciviously licking an ice cream cone on a commercial? I'm going to guesstimate here and say the likelihood that you have is around zero.

Escher Girls, a tumblr blog designed to "archive and showcase the prevalence of certain ways women are depicted in illustrated pop media, specifically how women are posed, drawn, distorted, and sexualized out of context, often in ridiculous, impossible or disturbing ways that sacrifice storytelling," explores the issue even further than Hines does by ridiculing and attempting to correct illustrations of women that are featured in comic books, manga, and the like. Both Hines and Escher Girls realize the real thing to be laughed at is the way in which women are portrayed in the media.

We have sexualized women for ages, demeaning and degrading them and making them out to be objects rather than functioning members of society. Men, on the other hand, are portrayed as being strong, rugged, powerful...and irresistible to women. The repercussions of this reverberate throughout the world, leading to rape, abuse, disempowerment, and a feeling that men are the superior sex. Our language further perpetuates this false belief. Someone who is scared or weak is "a pussy." Someone who is bad at pitching is told they "throw like a girl." Women who are strong and in a position of power are frequently portrayed as "bitches" who have slept their way to the top while a man in the same position of power is seen as a driven, hard-working individual who earned his distinction. The gender gap isn't about the differences between men and women; it's an unfortunate byproduct of deeply-held and erroneous cultural attitudes towards women.

As Hines states, it is not just sexism that is the issue. Homophobia and transphobia are similar cultural issues that need to be dealt with. I am a member of the LGBT community and have faced harassment and ridicule. LGBT friends of mine have had even worse to deal with: violence, discrimination, neglect. They have been disowned by their parents or have at least lived in fear of that happening if their family were to find out. A lot of the problems that the community faces stem from cultural beliefs held about us that are perpetuated by the media and religious groups. There is a good reason why GLAAD called ABC out on its show Work It: it's yet another attempt by the media to push the "men in dresses are funny" meme. And it's gotten pretty old.

This honestly started out as a post bringing awareness to Hines' efforts to raise money for a good cause. And I urge you to donate to it, obviously. But what started as a simple "Hey, here's something interesting" post has become a way for me to discuss what I think is a huge problem in our society today: othering. We see the world as "us" and "them." If "they" are different from "us" then we dehumanize them by laughing at them, hurting them, conquering them, trying to keep them from having what we have. Racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ageism, and the like are all ways of othering, of keeping all the power and money and whatever else we desire away from "them."

The issue isn't with the people being othered; it is with the people doing the othering. This country (and every other country) needs deep societal change in order to push forward toward equality. The only way that we are going to be able to provide safety, success, and a loving environment for all is to take a look at our prejudices, whether we know we have them or not, and to change ourselves. Our beliefs are not our own--they are influenced by the media, the government, religion, our parents. They are pushed upon us at an early age and it is up to us to break out of them and to start thinking for ourselves. They are socially driven but can be individually altered.

How are you working towards changing your own beliefs? How are you trying to break out of the social status quo?

-Gabe

Saturday, October 15, 2011

You Only Wish You Were This Fabulous: A Review of Will Grayson, Will Grayson by John Green and David Levithan


Title: Will Grayson, Will Grayson
Authors: John Green and David Levithan
Edition: Hardcover
Publisher: Dutton Books (2010)
Pages: 310
Challenges: 2011 GoodReads Reading Challenge
How I Came by This Book: I kept seeing this book on blogs and the cover was enough to make me want to read it. It, like a lot of the books on this blog, was obtained from my library.


About the Authors: John Green is the New York Times-bestselling author of Looking for Alaska, An Abundance of Katherines, and Paper Towns. He has received numerous awards, including both the Printz Medal and a Printz Honor. John is also the co-creator (with his brother, Hank) of the popular video blog Brotherhood 2.0, which has been watched more than 50 million times by Nerdfighter fans all over the globe. John Green lives in Indianapolis, Indiana.

David Levithan is an award-winning and New York Times-bestselling author of many books for teens, including Boy Meets Boy, Wide Awake, Love Is the Higher Law, and (with Rachel Cohn) Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist. He also works as an editor and, in his free time, takes way too many pictures. He lives in New Jersey.

Synopsis: It's not that far from Evanston to Naperville, but Chicago suburbanites Will Grayson and Will Grayson might as well live on different planets. When fate delivers them both to the same surprising crossroads, the Will Graysons find their lives overlapping and hurtling in new and unexpected directions. With a push from friends new and old--including the massive, and massively fabulous, Tiny Cooper, offensive lineman and musical theater auteur extraordinaire--Will and Will begin building toward respective romantic turns-of-heart and the epic production of history's most awesome high school musical.

Review: I've mentioned before that it takes a lot for me to read a YA novel. While I understand the need for the genre and am aware of the fact that teenagers find comfort and advice between the covers of these books, YA doesn't always do it for me. So when I grab a YA book off of the shelves at my library before anyone else can get their hands on it, you know that something about the book has me intrigued. So it was with Green and Levithan's Will Grayson, Will Grayson.

The story of two very different teenage boys with the same name, this novel chronicles only a few months but it covers a lot of territory in the process. Delving into teenage love (and angst), acceptance and tolerance of those who are different than you, depression, friendship, and, yes, musical theater, Green and Levithan have created an opus that resonates with its readers for as many different reasons as there are sets of hands holding the book. For me, reading about the triumphs and trials of gay teenagers in high school was the most meaningful part of this novel. Remembering my own high school experience and the hatred and intolerance that I (and others like me) endured made the eventual "fabulous" ending of Will Grayson, Will Grayson all the more satisfying. But that, of course, is not all.

While it took me a few chapters to really appreciate the characters, once I became better acquainted with them and their idiosyncrasies, I was invested in them and sped through the book to find out what happened. My favorite out of all of them is Tiny Cooper, friend to one Will Grayson and eventual love interest of the other. Tiny is a fun, unique character who jumps out of the book at you. Reminding me a little of guys that I've known while still managing to be unlike anyone I've ever known before, Tiny made a real impression on me. The other characters, including both Will Graysons, are all interesting in their own way and are pretty recognizable as people who walk the halls of any high school in this country. Watching them change and grow was a great experience and both authors manage, with only minor hiccups here and there, to form authentic teenagers.

The plot itself, I thought, was a little on the thin side, but that's because the story is character-driven. It's not that major things are happening to these kids, it's that they are being formed by the minor things that happen to them, even the ones that may seem major at the time. The high school musical production of Tiny's play, Tiny Dancer (later, Hold Me Closer) is what is driving these characters to the end of the novel but what's more important is how they act and react along the way.

The narrative is colorful, funny, and engaging and it holds the reader's attention. I spent only about a day reading this book because I didn't want to put it down. I wanted to know what was going to happen next, how the major players were going to clear the next hurdle. I enjoyed the alternating chapters and the differences in the two Will Graysons' personalities and story-telling styles. It made what was already a great book into an even better one.

I had a few little issues with the book, but nothing worth writing about. I'm never completely satisfied with dialogue in any book, nor was I entirely impressed with Will Grayson #2 (the one who doesn't capitalize, um, anything) at first. He grew on me pretty quickly but initially I was left wondering whether or not I was actually supposed to like him. These small, inconsequential things didn't detract from the novel in any major way and I ended up even getting choked up a little because of how fantastic the ending was.

I'm giving Will Grayson, Will Grayson 4 out of 5 Gabriels.


As an added bonus, here's a video of the song "Holland, 1945" by Neutral Milk Hotel, which is Will Grayson #1's favorite song (and which I didn't realize actually existed until I happened upon it unexpectedly):



-Gabe